Ripple has released a framework for cryptocurrency and digital asset regulation
“Cryptocurrency and blockchain technology need clear regulatory and licensing frameworks designed to address and remedy the specific challenges to our industry. All of the proposed measures discussed in this framework aim to provide legal clarity to industry, markets, and consumers in a way that a regulation-by-enforcement approach simply cannot,” said Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse.
“Developing an effective policy framework for cryptocurrencies will only be possible if there is clear communication and collaboration between private and public actors. That is the reason why we have proactively discussed the issue on a bipartisan basis with regulators and members of Congress,” said Susan Friedman, Head of Public Policy at Ripple. “These conversations have helped shape our perspective on the type of regulatory clarity the industry and broader ecosystem need from regulators, as well as the type of requirements regulators should demand from the industry.”
Key points
Public-private collaboration should be at the core of any legislative proposals
Any legislation or policy framework intended to regulate cryptocurrencies should promote an active dialogue between regulators and market participants. Public-private collaboration will lead to more tailored and effective policy outcomes for the industry and consumers alike.
Fostering this type of open dialogue is precisely the aim of the Eliminate Barriers to Innovation Act. The bill — which requires the establishment of a collaborative working group consisting of appointees from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as well as representatives from fintech companies, financial firms, and small businesses — passed the House and remains pending in the Senate.
Existing financial regulatory proposals can be adapted to regulate cryptocurrencies
U.S. financial markets are considered first in class and that is due in part to the existing regulatory framework under which they operate. That framework, as adapted to account for some of the unique attributes inherent to cryptocurrencies, can provide the clarity innovators seek – and the market protections consumers deserve. Two legislative proposals aim to accomplish exactly that.
The Securities Clarity Act (SCA) proposes a new term — “investment contract asset” — and makes clear that such assets should be considered separate and distinct from any securities offerings they may have been a part of. The Digital Commodity Exchange Act (DCEA), which is complementary to the SCA, seeks to create a federal definition of “digital commodity exchanges” and charges the CFTC with authority to register and oversee them, similar to the requirements in commodity derivatives markets. The SCA and DCEA seek to work within existing and well understood financial regulatory frameworks but adapt them for the innovation that cryptocurrency and blockchain represents.
Cryptocurrency innovation sandboxes should be fostered and encouraged
In order to incentivize innovation and inform the development of a consistent regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, innovation sandboxes should be fostered and considered. U.S. financial regulators should encourage the creation of a “safe harbor” regime under which network developers are allowed to launch their products and develop their networks for a limited period of time without needing to comply with federal securities laws, provided certain conditions are met. Innovation sandboxes are a prime example of how public-private collaboration could form the basis of rational regulation.
Ripple believes that each of the above proposals will provide regulatory clarity – fostering innovation and industry growth within the United States. This can be done while also maintaining the strong consumer and investor protections America is known for.
This is only positive for the current case SEC v Ripple– Exciting times ahead for XRP holders
